LABS

Research groups working inside the Center.

Lab

QUALIA Lab — QUantifying ALignment and Interpretability in AI

QUALIA Lab studies interpretability, consciousness and alignment in humans and AI systems. We ask what a model’s self-reports and internal states can tell us about whether it has experiences, and how to check that its goals match ours. We emphasise the humanities approach, and see these systems as a way of learning more about ourselves along the way.

What the lab works on

  1. Consciousness

    What consciousness is in humans, and which of its features could appear in artificial systems.

  2. Introspection and self-report

    How humans and AI systems report on their own states, and when those reports count as evidence.

  3. Interpretability

    Reading the internal states of AI systems with the standards cognitive science applies to human minds.

  4. Alignment

    What it would mean for an AI system to share human goals, and how anyone could tell.

People

  • Lab lead

    Kristina Šekrst

    Assistant Professor, Center for Cognitive Science, University of Zagreb

    Machine Learning Lead, Meedan

  • Research associate

    Sandro Skansi

    Associate Professor, Faculty of Croatian Studies, University of Zagreb

  • External research associate

    Barbara Geld

    TU Wien

Work

Cover of The Illusion Engine: The Quest for Machine Consciousness

Book · Springer Nature, 2025

The Illusion Engine: The Quest for Machine Consciousness

Kristina Šekrst

Whether an artificial system can experience the world, followed through philosophy, neuroscience and the architecture of current AI — from cybernetics and the imitation game to large language models and the hard problem.

In progress

  • Cover of Introduction to Deep Learning: Neural Networks, Large Language Models and Agentic AI

    BookSpringer, 2026

    Introduction to Deep Learning: Neural Networks, Large Language Models and Agentic AI

    Second edition, from neural networks to large language models and agentic AI.

    Sandro Skansi & Kristina Šekrst

  • Paperin review

    Dennett’s marks of qualia in language models

    Uses mechanistic interpretability to test Dennett’s four marks of qualia against language models. Privacy and ineffability are present, intrinsicality holds only in a weakened diachronic form, and direct apprehensibility is absent.

    Kristina Šekrst

  • Paperwork in progress

    Human Incompatible: Waiting for the Helpful Robot After RLHF

    Argues that Russell’s Human Compatible framework fails structurally, because training turns the properties that define a beneficial machine into optimisation targets with no way to verify them.

    Barbara Geld & Kristina Šekrst

  • SymposiumALIGN27 proposal, work in progress

    Alignment and Interpretability

    On the philosophical and ethical assumptions behind AI alignment and interpretability methods, asking what these methods actually establish and who answers for their failures.

    Kristina Šekrst, John Dorsch (Prague), Barbara Geld (Vienna), Scott Hale (Oxford), Erik Persson (Lund), Mirko Daniel Garasic (Rome) and Roman Krzanowski (Kraków), co-organised with Meedan